Differences between the ways male and female science students relate to mentors could have a significant impact on efforts to attract more women to certain fields, according to a new study focused on chemistry and published in the journal Sex Roles.
The study tracked those who graduated from top doctoral programs in chemistry from 1988 to 1992, and asked the graduates a series of questions about their experience with mentors, finding notable differences. Authors of the study say that while much has changed in society since the period studied, the findings are consistent with more recent analyses of women in science, and also promote understanding of a generation of women currently in academe.
Among the findings:
Cumulatively, the authors suggest, these results point to the ways that mentoring differences affect the experience of female science students throughout their educations.
Susan Nolan, one of the authors and an associate dean at Seton Hall University, said that the data help to provide not "just a snapshot," but the impressions of men and women in science "looking back at their career trajectories." Nolan said she and her fellow authors hope the study will help academics "pinpoint the patterns that lead to gender disparities we still see."
It's clear, she said, "that women do not perceive that they are receiving the same level of advising and mentoring as men."
Nolan and the others at Seton Hall involved in the study -- Janine P. Buckner, Cecilia H. Marzabadi and Valerie J. Kuck -- plan a follow-up study looking at the fields of physics, electrical and chemical engineering, and mathematics.